Unpredictable

Commentary

• 1730122921027

  Comments on Recent Cases: October 2024

  A party to litigation has a duty to preserve relevant evidence.  They can’t just shred everything to leave their adversary without evidence at trial.  But parties may disagree about the extent they need to preserve.  If a judge decides one side did not preserve enough, she may decide to tell a jury to assume the missing evidence was bad for the party who did not preserve it.

  Read More
• 1727694455113

  Comments on Recent Cases: September 2024

  I wrote a cover story in the most recent issue of Litigation News, a publication of the ABA Section of Litigation.  It is about a challenge that journalists made to a Texas law that restricts the use of drones.  And while the court ultimately refused to strike down the law, it considered whether the federal government even permits states to regulate the use of airspace and the balance between the right of journalists to take photographs and the ability of the government to restrict certain locations from interference.

  Read More
• 1724676309440

  Comments on Recent Cases: August 2024

  Many lawsuits arise from allegations that the defendant did something terrible. And, consistent with the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant’s conduct was awful, many complaints allege that the defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress on the plaintiff. But not all misconduct gives rise to an “IIED” claim.

  Read More
• 1722250642396

  Comments on Recent Cases: July 2024

  A major issue that arises in defamation litigation is whether the statement at issue is a fact that can be proven true or false or whether it is an opinion.  Only a false statement of fact can be the basis of a damages claim, and so a judge must decide whether the statement is a fact before the question of falsity can go before a jury.  And the legal definition of a fact may differ from how many people understand it from generally using the word.

  Read More
• 1719232520217

  Comments on Recent Cases: June 2024

  Litigants often argue to the court that a trial is not necessary because the claims fail as a matter of law or because all of the evidence in the case can only support one side.  But there are some kinds of claims that are difficult to dismiss before a trial because the evidence is almost always imprecise and requires a judge or jury to evaluate credibility.  Employment discrimination claims, for example, often involve competing statements by witnesses, and so it usually cannot be said that all of the evidence supports only one side.

  Read More
• 1716892079771

  Comments on Recent Cases: May 2024

  New York courts allow a plaintiff to sue someone who receives an invoice without objecting to it.  Unlike a traditional breach of contract action, an “account stated” action just is limited to whether the invoice was delivered and whether the defendant objected.

  Read More
• 1714390925767

  Comments on Recent Cases: April 2024

  Since litigation is expensive, many people rely on their insurance carriers to assume the costs of a lawsuit.  But insurance often contains exceptions to coverage, there are often lawsuits to determine whether the insurer is obligated to defend.

  Read More
• 1711374210453

  Comments on Recent Cases: March 2024

  Once a lawsuit is over, a plaintiff may face obstacles in trying their same lawsuit again.  Courts respect the principle of res judicata, which means that once a case is decided, the decision is binding in future lawsuits.  But still, some litigants test the limits of what that means.

  Read More