Judges do not just rubber stamp requests for default judgments. They often scrutinize a plaintiff’s request for one to make sure they served papers correctly and that they submitted adequate evidence to support their case.
Read More
Korean courts are efficient, with specialized judges who have strong expertise in commercial law, making them effective at handling complex disputes. Their focus on written submissions ensures clarity and thorough consideration of the issues.
Read More
A party to litigation has a duty to preserve relevant evidence. They can’t just shred everything to leave their adversary without evidence at trial. But parties may disagree about the extent they need to preserve. If a judge decides one side did not preserve enough, she may decide to tell a jury to assume the missing evidence was bad for the party who did not preserve it.
Read More
Before delivering bad news, it helps to let a client know what to expect. This way, they will not be blindsided when an adverse event occurs. Doing this is tricky because, if a lawyer only shares worst case scenarios, the client may get too scared to proceed in situations where risks are low. They may also mistake a worst case scenario for a prediction of failure.
Read More
While the discovery rules are technically uniform within a jurisdiction or, to some extent, nationwide, different judges take different approaches in enforcing them. Accordingly, a lot of discovery disputes involve lawyers huffing and puffing about how they know what the rules are and how shocked they are that the other side is brazenly violating them, only to later see the judge sees it all a different way.
Read More
Despite several e-justice projects in the pipeline or on their way to be adopted, Luxembourg is still in the early stages of electronic filing. Everything is still done on paper. This mass of paperwork leads me to say that our law firms have, in their secretariats, a real in-house print shop.
Read More
I wrote a cover story in the most recent issue of Litigation News, a publication of the ABA Section of Litigation. It is about a challenge that journalists made to a Texas law that restricts the use of drones. And while the court ultimately refused to strike down the law, it considered whether the federal government even permits states to regulate the use of airspace and the balance between the right of journalists to take photographs and the ability of the government to restrict certain locations from interference.
Read More
How do you start a lawsuit? The answer in a lot of places and under many situations is by electronically filing a document!
Read More
Federal courts tend to be more structured, with stricter rules and procedures. This can be both a blessing and a curse. For one, it ensures that cases are handled with a high level of scrutiny and professionalism. However, the process can also be slower and more expensive due to the complexity of federal cases.
Read More
Once a party wins a lawsuit, they do not automatically get their costs and attorney’s fees repaid. Instead, they need to get the court to approve the amount of money they spent. This ensures that the prevailing party does not claim an exorbitant amount of fees and costs. To do so, they may submit a “bill of costs,” listing all of the expenses they incurred in the suit. A clerk may approve some and disallow others.
Read More
It is very tiring and cumbersome dealing with an entrenched insurance industry that controls the court system and the legislature. The New York State court system is barely functional. Cases that should settle within 1 year often take 5 years. The insurance industry has figured out how to get the court system to work for them, rather than for the people.
Read More
Many lawsuits arise from allegations that the defendant did something terrible. And, consistent with the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant’s conduct was awful, many complaints allege that the defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress on the plaintiff. But not all misconduct gives rise to an “IIED” claim.
Read More