Seeking Leave to Appeal

When people appeal, it is usually because they think the lower court made a mistake or used bad reasoning. But fixing mistakes or correcting reasoning is not the only thing that an appeals court may look for. And so petitions for leave often make other arguments besides a need to change the result in the petitioner’s own case. Instead, petitioners may argue that taking the case is important for reasons broader than the individual interests of the parties to the case.

Pre and Post Trial Briefing

After a bench trial concludes, each side will have a copy of all of the exhibits that came into evidence and a transcript of all of the testimony. Instead of relying on the judge to comb through all of that evidence to decide what the facts are, the parties will do that themselves and then present the judge with “proposed findings of fact.”

Hack Attack? Call Your Lawyer, Not Your IT Department

Every organization should have a formal data incident response plan, but most can be simplified to one overarching element: call your cybersecurity counsel immediately. This puts your best player on the field in the first minute of the game. In doing so, you can establish an attorney-client privileged communication channel at the outset. Your outside counsel will serve as your advisor and concierge, coordinating the incident response.

Amicus Briefs

Amicus briefs are still formal documents, not just a comment in a website’s comments section. This means that, even though a brief may nominally come from a person or organization, it is really written by a lawyer and in the style of a legal argument. The brief must explain who the “amicus” (the “friend of the court” who is offering the brief) is, why they have an interest in the case, and then set forth the amicus’s argument.

Gathering Information

I sometimes work with private investigators who call and meet with people to learn more about the subjects of an investigation. And sometimes I do this work myself, picking up the phone or writing emails, contacting people who may have helpful information.

Closing Arguments

A trial may drag on for awhile, and so the closing statement gives a lawyer the chance to get the fact finder to recall important evidence from the beginning of the trial. And to assign some weight to the evidence: a witness who spoke for three days may not be more important than the one who spoke for an hour, and so the closing statement lets the lawyer spend more time on the important details and convey to others the relative importance of evidence.

Products Liability Litigation

In some situations, the law will impose “strict liability” on a defendant. This means that, if a plaintiff is injured, it does not matter whose fault it is. This is meant to give manufacturers an incentive to make their products so safe that the risk of any injury, even one they could claim is not their fault, is low.

TV and AI: Mixing Two Topics and Four Letters

A few years ago, I wrote posts about technology and the law and about how litigation is depicted on television. As kind of a mash-up of these posts, I asked Google Bard to write a blog post about litigation on television. And, to my surprise, the post was actually pretty insightful. So I’m sharing that post and my commentary on it and on legal insights written by AI.

Surprises

Surprises also arise before trial. Sometimes in discovery, lawyers will discover emails that contradict their understanding of the case. And sometimes, parties will make surprising offers to settle (or not to settle) or decisions about what arguments to pursue. Lastly, I am often surprised by lawyers acting weird, which they frequently do.

When Not to Litigate

Some defendants may also litigate cases that cost more money to defend than to settle because they want to set their own internal precedent. They want potential plaintiff to know that they will not hand out easy settlements to anyone who sues them, but instead will fight. This may cost short term losses, but may save money in the long run by discouraging additional weak lawsuits.

Qui Tam Litigation

Plaintiffs normally sue defendants to recover for a loss they suffered. In fact, a plaintiff often must show “standing,” or the fact that they are the right party to sue the defendant because they are the ones who suffered the loss the defendant caused. But in some situations, a plaintiff may sue to recover money that the defendant stole from the government.

Beyond Ink: Navigating the New Age of Contracts

Emojis, once seen as playful expressions, now carry significant legal implications. A recent Canadian court ruling offers a stark example. It determined a thumbs-up emoji acted as a digital signature, binding a business to an $82,200 contract.This ruling underscores that emojis are not mere decorative flourishes; rather, they can bear legal significance in business transactions.