Motions to Disqualify Counsel

In some cases, the lawyer herself may be involved in the facts of the case and so have the need to testify as a fact witness. In those cases, she may be prohibited from serving as trial counsel through the “advocate witness rule.” This rule arises from the fear that a juror may believe a lawyer is more credible than a lay witness. This rule, however, ordinarily does not preclude the lawyer from representing her client in matters before the judge because courts are less concerned that judges will put undue credit on the testimony of a lawyer.

Expert Reports

A professional expert may seem less credible to a judge or jury; after all, their career depends upon providing favorable testimony to whoever pays them. But a professional expert may also be more knowledgeable about how to testify at depositions or at trial, or better able to prepare an expert report. And a professional expert may also be able to provide a list of previous cases in which other judges agreed that her testimony was persuasive, which may convince the next judge that she is reliable.

Statutes of Limitation

Some people wait a long time before approaching a lawyer with a potential case. When something terrible happens, a long, expensive, exhausting process may not be a person’t priority. But when people do come to a lawyer, no matter how valid their claim may be, it may not be successful if they waited too long. This is because statutes of limitation cause claims to expire.

Summary Judgment

Many court rules require a party who moves for summary judgment to submit a statement of undisputed facts. An example is Local Rule 56.1 in the Northern District of Illinois. This statement is usually separate from the memorandum of law and contains numbered paragraphs that state each fact that the movant states is not in dispute and therefore does not require a trial. After each statement, the movant should cite evidence to support the claim. And when drafting this statement, the movant should make sure that there is not evidence that disputes the claim.

Responding to Interrogatories

Getting answers usually involves working with the client and often reviewing source documents to ensure that the answers are correct. This is because a party is often bound by the answers provided in the interrogatories, so it is important that the responses are accurate. Moreover, the client often needs to sign a verification statement, swearing under oath that the statements in the interrogatory responses are true.

Oral Arguments

Unlike an argument in a bar or at the dinner table, oral arguments in commercial litigation usually have an organized structure. In a trial court, the judge normally invites the lawyer making a motion to explain why her motion should be granted. And at an appellate court, the judges invite the appellant’s lawyer to explain why the trial court’s decision should be reversed. Then the lawyer begins speaking and opposing counsel is supposed to remain silent. The judge or judges, however, may interrupt with questions and even maintain a back and forth conversation with the attorney about the arguments.

Making a Motion

A movant will often submit a legal report, called a brief or memorandum of law, explaining why the motion should be granted. The brief will usually recount the facts of the case and cite relevant law that explains why the judge should grant the motion. These documents can range in length from a few pages to twenty-five or more. Briefs often refer to evidence and, when they do, they cite to supporting affidavits or declarations.

Class Actions

Many class action settlements are very low. Sometimes the class members get fewer than a hundred dollars, or even no money at all, but a free product instead. This is because the damages to individual plaintiffs may be low, and because settlements generally do not fully compensate plaintiffs as they reflect a compromise between the parties. But even when the payments to class members is low, the plaintiffs’ attorney may receive a substantial payment from the defendant for their fees working on the case.

Sworn Statements

An affidavit will often have the “caption” or the name of the relevant lawsuit at the top of the page. Beneath that is usually the title of the document in all caps: AFFIDAVIT OF JANE SMITH. And then after a paragraph that says that the person who signed the affidavit (often called the “affiant”) did so under oath, there are usually a series of numbered paragraphs.

Amended Complaints

If a complaint alleges fraud, the complaint may be vulnerable to a motion to dismiss if it does not allege that the defendant knew her statements were false at the time she made them because that is a necessary component of the claim. If the defendant moves to dismiss on those grounds, the plaintiff may address the deficiency by amending her complaint to include the necessary allegation.

Joint Defense Groups

Counsel for minor participants often listen carefully to each of the joint defense calls to make sure that none of the issues negatively affect their clients. Since the major participants may not be thinking of the minor participants when doing their work, it is up to the minor participants’ counsel to make sure that their clients’ interests are protected.

The Uniform Commercial Code

The UCC provides a lot of rules about what happens in the event of a breach. For example, it holds a seller responsible for the quality of goods it ships until the goods arrive at the buyer’s location, except in certain specific situations. And it sets forth how a buyer can reject defective goods.