Filtered by Category: Commentary
Many agreements are governed by the statute of frauds, a legal doctrine that requires certain agreements to be in writing. But a signed contract is not the only kind of agreement that satisfies this rule.
Read More
Courts will dismiss litigation over out-of-state defendants where there is an insufficient connection between the state and the claims. Even if a defendant does business in the same state as the court, that alone may be insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.
Read More
Through a doctrine called respondeat superior, an employer can be held civilly liable in litigation for the negligence of its employees. This often leads to defendants arguing they should not be liable because they are not technically the employer of the negligent person.
Read More
Through a doctrine called respondeat superior, an employer can be held civilly liable in litigation for the negligence of its employees. This often leads to defendants arguing they should not be liable because they are not technically the employer of the negligent person.
Read More
Plaintiffs get to pick who represent them, but a defendant may ask the court to disqualify their lawyer anyway. Ordinarily they do this when there is a conflict of interest, such as when the plaintiff’s lawyer also represents the defendant. But defendants may make this motion in other situations as well.
Read More
A fraud case often requires an explicit false statement and the plaintiff’s justifiable reliance on the statement. A case based on the failure to disclose the truth, instead of an outright lie, is harder. And a judge may dismiss a fraud claim entirely if the plaintiff knew the truth the whole time.
Read More
In a recent case, New York’s highest court held that the publisher of a book of landlord tenant laws was not deceptive when it published a volume that omitted numerous relevant laws that long predated its publication. The majority held that the book expressly stated that it did not represent its accuracy and the very fact that laws can change means that no one should rely upon it to be perfectly accurate.
Read More
One way in which courts have the power to enforce their orders is by holding disobedient parties in contempt. When a party is in contempt, they could be forced to pay fines or even put in jail. Although I have never personally seen a party in a commercial case put in jail for contempt, I have read a few cases where courts have awarded fines.
Read More
A party in litigation may give an adversary a series of statements to which they must admit or deny. For example, one may say “Admit you were an employee of X Corp. on January 5, 2017.” These are called “notices to admit.” But courts have held that their use has limits.
Read More
To survive a motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff usually needs to submit some evidence that could support an eventual win at trial. Though they can do this by submitting a sworn statement, a court often will disregard a witness statement if it contradicts his deposition testimony. This prevents lawyers from “fixing” a bad statement at deposition by writing up a better answer later.
Read More
This month, the American Bar Association Magazine published two of my articles about recent decisions. One was a federal appellate decision about employment discrimination and the other was a Texas Supreme Court case about the transfer of liability in asset purchases.
Read More
Parties frequently expect more from contractors than what their contract explicitly requires. Often they believe that the contract is a formality and the real agreement comes from their pre-contract discussions or common sense. This is not always the case.
Read More