Recent Posts
-
More Thoughts on Confidentiality
Lawyers are not public relations specialists, and so they may not consider how a particular argument could be viewed in the court of public opinion or how a statement could be viewed out of context.
Read More -
Litigating From Home
When I worked in an office, I almost always bought lunch at local lunch places. In midtown Manhattan, that would cost millions of dollars each week. Now, I make sandwiches, eat leftovers, or make other quick meals.
Read More -
Litigation in Botswana
The way that customary law works, it applies to people who live in tribal communities where the value of claim is usually very small. So when you deal with commercial disputes, the amount at stake is higher and so civil law applies.
Read More -
Comments on Recent Cases: November 2024
A principal question a lawyer must ask before commencing litigation is who the correct plaintiff should be. Not every plaintiff has standing to bring a lawsuit, and making the wrong choice may not be easy to fix. In some cases this is an easy question, but in others it can be more difficult.
Read More
Litigation Practice
-
More Thoughts on Confidentiality
Lawyers are not public relations specialists, and so they may not consider how a particular argument could be viewed in the court of public opinion or how a statement could be viewed out of context.
Read More -
Litigating From Home
When I worked in an office, I almost always bought lunch at local lunch places. In midtown Manhattan, that would cost millions of dollars each week. Now, I make sandwiches, eat leftovers, or make other quick meals.
Read More -
-
More Thoughts on Defaults
Judges do not just rubber stamp requests for default judgments. They often scrutinize a plaintiff’s request for one to make sure they served papers correctly and that they submitted adequate evidence to support their case.
Read More -
Bad News
Before delivering bad news, it helps to let a client know what to expect. This way, they will not be blindsided when an adverse event occurs. Doing this is tricky because, if a lawyer only shares worst case scenarios, the client may get too scared to proceed in situations where risks are low. They may also mistake a worst case scenario for a prediction of failure.
Read More -
More Thoughts on Document Discovery Basics
While the discovery rules are technically uniform within a jurisdiction or, to some extent, nationwide, different judges take different approaches in enforcing them. Accordingly, a lot of discovery disputes involve lawyers huffing and puffing about how they know what the rules are and how shocked they are that the other side is brazenly violating them, only to later see the judge sees it all a different way.
Read More -
More Thoughts on E-Filing
How do you start a lawsuit? The answer in a lot of places and under many situations is by electronically filing a document!
Read More -
Key Differences Between California State Courts and Federal Courts in Litigation
Federal courts tend to be more structured, with stricter rules and procedures. This can be both a blessing and a curse. For one, it ensures that cases are handled with a high level of scrutiny and professionalism. However, the process can also be slower and more expensive due to the complexity of federal cases.
Read More
Interviews
-
Litigation in Botswana
The way that customary law works, it applies to people who live in tribal communities where the value of claim is usually very small. So when you deal with commercial disputes, the amount at stake is higher and so civil law applies.
Read More -
Litigation in South Korea
Korean courts are efficient, with specialized judges who have strong expertise in commercial law, making them effective at handling complex disputes. Their focus on written submissions ensures clarity and thorough consideration of the issues.
Read More -
Litigation in Luxembourg
Despite several e-justice projects in the pipeline or on their way to be adopted, Luxembourg is still in the early stages of electronic filing. Everything is still done on paper. This mass of paperwork leads me to say that our law firms have, in their secretariats, a real in-house print shop.
Read More -
Personal Injury Litigation
It is very tiring and cumbersome dealing with an entrenched insurance industry that controls the court system and the legislature. The New York State court system is barely functional. Cases that should settle within 1 year often take 5 years. The insurance industry has figured out how to get the court system to work for them, rather than for the people.
Read More -
Litigation in Ireland
The first step in a personal injury case is for a plaintiff to go to a personal injuries board, which is designed to take pressure off of the courts. The board sends the plaintiff to its own doctors. The board then sends a proposed settlement figure to the parties and, if both parties accept the figure, they can avoid court. This process can take nearly a year and a half.
Read More -
Litigation Historically in Mormon Courts
By 1847, Mormons settled in Utah, Southern Idaho, Nevada, and Arizona. They were isolated and far from the center of the federal government. Although there was a territorial government, where they were, ecclesiastical institutions were more vibrant and powerful. Therefore, the Church court system was the dominant way to resolve disputes in pioneer Utah throughout the 19th century.
Read More -
Litigation in Zimbabwe
The courts in Zimbabwe are open to the public. However, with the introduction of virtual hearings, the public has no access to such hearings. It is only where the hearings are held physically that the public can watch the proceedings.
Read More -
Litigation in Sweden
There are not many special courts in Sweden. Many judges have to handle both commercial cases, but also crime and family law.
Read More
Commentary
Comments on Recent Cases: November 2024
A principal question a lawyer must ask before commencing litigation is who the correct plaintiff should be. Not every plaintiff has standing to bring a lawsuit, and making the wrong choice may not be easy to fix. In some cases this is an easy question, but in others it can be more difficult.
Read MoreComments on Recent Cases: October 2024
A party to litigation has a duty to preserve relevant evidence. They can’t just shred everything to leave their adversary without evidence at trial. But parties may disagree about the extent they need to preserve. If a judge decides one side did not preserve enough, she may decide to tell a jury to assume the missing evidence was bad for the party who did not preserve it.
Read MoreComments on Recent Cases: September 2024
I wrote a cover story in the most recent issue of Litigation News, a publication of the ABA Section of Litigation. It is about a challenge that journalists made to a Texas law that restricts the use of drones. And while the court ultimately refused to strike down the law, it considered whether the federal government even permits states to regulate the use of airspace and the balance between the right of journalists to take photographs and the ability of the government to restrict certain locations from interference.
Read MoreComments on Recent Cases: August 2024
Many lawsuits arise from allegations that the defendant did something terrible. And, consistent with the plaintiff’s claim that the defendant’s conduct was awful, many complaints allege that the defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress on the plaintiff. But not all misconduct gives rise to an “IIED” claim.
Read MoreComments on Recent Cases: July 2024
A major issue that arises in defamation litigation is whether the statement at issue is a fact that can be proven true or false or whether it is an opinion. Only a false statement of fact can be the basis of a damages claim, and so a judge must decide whether the statement is a fact before the question of falsity can go before a jury. And the legal definition of a fact may differ from how many people understand it from generally using the word.
Read MoreComments on Recent Cases: June 2024
Litigants often argue to the court that a trial is not necessary because the claims fail as a matter of law or because all of the evidence in the case can only support one side. But there are some kinds of claims that are difficult to dismiss before a trial because the evidence is almost always imprecise and requires a judge or jury to evaluate credibility. Employment discrimination claims, for example, often involve competing statements by witnesses, and so it usually cannot be said that all of the evidence supports only one side.
Read MoreComments on Recent Cases: May 2024
New York courts allow a plaintiff to sue someone who receives an invoice without objecting to it. Unlike a traditional breach of contract action, an “account stated” action just is limited to whether the invoice was delivered and whether the defendant objected.
Read MoreComments on Recent Cases: April 2024
Since litigation is expensive, many people rely on their insurance carriers to assume the costs of a lawsuit. But insurance often contains exceptions to coverage, there are often lawsuits to determine whether the insurer is obligated to defend.
Read More